Another Proposal For What We Should Call Ourselves

Okay, so we have one comment by Jim Davila that we should maybe not use "biblioblogger." That’s fine. I’m not particularly attached to it.

Then Jim West gives us the option of "Bible Scholar Blogger," which Cook thinks is too cumbersome (and I agree).

And I think Cook is right in saying that "Bible Blogger" sounds a little fundamentalist. His suggestion is "bibliablogger".

Stephen Carlson finds merit in "bibliablogger," though also suggests "biblicoblogger."

Me...I don’t have a strong opinion at this point. If we want to consider "biblicoblogger" we might want to think about "biblicablogger", which I’m sure the journal Biblica would appreciate. I’m fine with "bibliablogger", I suppose, but it is not different enough from "biblioblogger" for most people to notice or care, I bet. So, nothing has really struck my fancy.

Though I’m glad we’ve had this conversation. I’m going to have to fit in the term "blogorrhea" into my posts occassionally. Thanks for the term, Edward.